Accreditation: Recommendations - Revision history

Isabelle at 09:59, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T09:59:46Z

Isabelle at 13:02, 24 March 2021

2021-03-24T13:02:42Z

Isabelle at 08:50, 17 March 2021

2021-03-17T08:50:16Z

Isabelle at 08:25, 22 February 2021

2021-02-22T08:25:19Z

Isabelle at 09:57, 18 January 2021

2021-01-18T09:57:17Z

Isabelle at 09:56, 18 January 2021

2021-01-18T09:56:50Z

Isabelle: Created page with "Would you like to do a quality accreditation? Here are some possibilities: * ISO9001 * EQIPD * Premier * GLP"

2021-01-18T09:56:06Z

Created page with "Would you like to do a quality accreditation? Here are some possibilities: * ISO9001 * EQIPD * Premier * GLP"

New page

Would you like to do a quality accreditation?

Here are some possibilities:

* [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|ISO9001]]

* EQIPD

* Premier

* GLP

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 Several quality systems are available and we describe four in greater detail:
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|ISO9001]]
+* [[Current guidelines and norms#ISO|ISO9001]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#EQIPD|EQIPD Quality System]]
+* [[Current guidelines and norms#EQIPD|EQIPD Quality System]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#Premier|Premier]]
+* [[Current guidelines and norms#Premier|Premier]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#GLP|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]
+* [[Current guidelines and norms#GLP|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]
 These quality systems fulfil slightly different purposes and depending on the situation they might be a requirement, whereas others could indeed be just a tool for a research group to improve their organization and systematic procedures. If a core facility is mainly looking for such systematic procedures, the ISO9001 standard might be the first choice to look into. For core facilities with a purely academic orientation the newly developed EQIPD and PREMIER quality systems might be more relevant.

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 24 March 2021
Line 16:		Line 16:

	These quality systems fulfil slightly different purposes and depending on the situation they might be a requirement, whereas others could indeed be just a tool for a research group to improve their organization and systematic procedures. If a core facility is mainly looking for such systematic procedures, the ISO9001 standard might be the first choice to look into. For core facilities with a purely academic orientation the newly developed EQIPD and PREMIER quality systems might be more relevant.		These quality systems fulfil slightly different purposes and depending on the situation they might be a requirement, whereas others could indeed be just a tool for a research group to improve their organization and systematic procedures. If a core facility is mainly looking for such systematic procedures, the ISO9001 standard might be the first choice to look into. For core facilities with a purely academic orientation the newly developed EQIPD and PREMIER quality systems might be more relevant.
		+
		+
		+	[[Start_here\|Go back to menu]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 An accreditation is the recognition that required practices are implemented and maintained. It shows independent parties that an organization works according to well established practices and brings confidence and trust in a facility.
-They can also be seen as a good and helpful exercise to reflect on our own behaviors. Like a mirror, they identify gaps or aspects to improve within a given research unit. Seeing it in such a way, an accreditation is like a tool to develop further instead of being seen as a burden.
+They can also be seen as a good and helpful exercise to reflect on our own behaviours. Like a mirror, they identify gaps or aspects to improve within a given research unit. Seeing it in such a way, an accreditation is like a tool to develop further instead of being seen as a burden.
 Several quality systems are available and we describe four in greater detail:
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 * [[Actual guidelines and norms#GLP|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]
-These quality systems fulfill slightly different purposes and depending on the situation they might be a requirement, whereas others could indeed be just a tool for a research group to improve their organization and systematic procedures. If a core facility is mainly looking for such systematic procedures, the ISO9001 standard might be the first choice to look into. For core facilities with a purely academic orientation the newly developed EQIPD and PREMIER quality systems might be more relevant.
+These quality systems fulfil slightly different purposes and depending on the situation they might be a requirement, whereas others could indeed be just a tool for a research group to improve their organization and systematic procedures. If a core facility is mainly looking for such systematic procedures, the ISO9001 standard might be the first choice to look into. For core facilities with a purely academic orientation the newly developed EQIPD and PREMIER quality systems might be more relevant.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Would you like to do a quality accreditation?
+Why is an accreditation important for research labs?
-Here are some possibilities:
+An accreditation is the recognition that required practices are implemented and maintained. It shows independent parties that an organization works according to well established practices and brings confidence and trust in a facility.
 * [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|ISO9001]]
@@ Line 10: / Line 14: @@
 * [[Actual guidelines and norms#GLP|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|ISO9001]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|EQIPD Quality System]]
+* [[Actual guidelines and norms#EQIPD|EQIPD Quality System]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|Premier]]
+* [[Actual guidelines and norms#Premier|Premier]]
-* [[Actual guidelines and norms#ISO|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]
+* [[Actual guidelines and norms#GLP|Good Laboratory practice (GLP)]]