Difference between revisions of "Welcome to Q-CoFa"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| width="30%" valign="top" style="background-color:#fff3c1; padding:5px; border:5px; border-radius:50px;"| | | width="30%" valign="top" style="background-color:#fff3c1; padding:5px; border:5px; border-radius:50px;"| | ||
| − | :'''Q-CoFa:''' | + | :'''Q-CoFa:''' '''Q'''uality assurance at the interface between '''Co'''re '''Fa'''cilities and their users |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:36, 26 November 2020
Q-CoFa: Quality assurance at the interface between Core Facilities and their users
|
Why Q-CoFa?
In 2016 a survey of 1500 scientists published in Nature [1] highlighted that 70% scientists could not reproduce published results. We are now all aware of the importance of quality management, however there is still room for improvements.
Mission of Q-CoFa
This website presents a compilation of practical recommendations to improve research quality and service in your core facility. These are general ideas and principles how to improve research quality. The solutions need to be customized and adapted to the specific needs of your core facility.
Start here
Recommendations based on
- Survey results of 275 Core Facilities (in over 30 different fields) in 2020. Survey about quality and management between CF and users.
- Review of current literature
- Actual guidelines and norms
Recommendations useful for
- improving research quality
- improving efficiency and service
- review your facility (critical self-assessment)
- preparing for an audit
- setting up a new core facility
Test yourself
Please contribute
This is a wiki website. Please feel free to participate to the dynamic improvement of this site. We welcome your collaboration.
