Difference between revisions of "Quality improvements: Recommendations"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* [[Training the users: Recommendations|training]], conferences/workshops | * [[Training the users: Recommendations|training]], conferences/workshops | ||
* improve [[SOPs: Recommendations|SOPs]], [[Data management: Recommendations|data management]], [[Documentation: Recommendations|documentation]]. | * improve [[SOPs: Recommendations|SOPs]], [[Data management: Recommendations|data management]], [[Documentation: Recommendations|documentation]]. | ||
| − | * [[Accreditation: Recommendations|quality accreditation]], audit, yearly review of CF processes, CF staff feedback, [[:File:User-feedback-form.docx|user’s feedback]] | + | * [[Accreditation: Recommendations|quality accreditation]], [[Quality improvements: Recommendations|audit, yearly review of CF processes]], CF staff feedback, [[:File:User-feedback-form.docx|user’s feedback]] |
Revision as of 14:49, 19 January 2021
There are many possibilities to improve research quality:
- Use of a management software and ELN to improve efficiency and traceability.
- maintain the equipment, keep up with technology, automate processes.
- training, conferences/workshops
- improve SOPs, data management, documentation.
- quality accreditation, audit, yearly review of CF processes, CF staff feedback, user’s feedback
Audit / Review
A yearly audit from external colleagues or a self-review with all the CF staff will allow you to reflect on your performance, identify and solve problems together and think of possible improvements.
- Present: review the current processes.
- Future: identify improvements to implement in the coming year.
- Past: check the implementation status of the previous year’s resolutions and assess their usefulness.
Write a summary of the session, including the findings, solutions and responsibilities. And don’t forget to schedule the next year meeting…
