Difference between revisions of "Welcome to Q-CoFa"

From Q-CoFa
Jump to: navigation, search
(Who is Q-CoFa for?)
 
(96 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[File:Q-CoFa-title.jpg|800px]]
 +
__NOTOC__ <!-- removes table of content -->
 +
== What is Q-CoFa? ==
  
Q-CoFa: Quality assurance at the interface between Core Facilities and their users
+
Q-CoFa is a project funded by [https://www.bmbf.de/ BMBF] to assess the interactions between core facilities and their users in order to provide recommendations for improving research practices and data quality. It was initiated as a response to the recent data reproducibility crisis in life-sciences, as exemplified by the survey of 1500 scientists published in Nature in 2016 [http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970], revealing that 70% scientists could not reproduce published results.
[[File:Q-CoFa-title.jpg|left|]]
 
  
 +
== Who is Q-CoFa for? ==
  
{|
+
This website is mainly intended for core facility leader but the information is also useful to core facility staff members and users.
| width="50%" valign="top" style="background-color:#fff3c1; padding:5px; border-radius:50px;"|
+
 
:'''Q-CoFa:''' '''Q'''uality assurance at the interface between '''Co'''re '''Fa'''cilities and their users
+
== Mission of Q-CoFa ==
|}
 
  
__NOTOC__ <!-- removes table of content -->
+
This website presents a compilation of practical recommendations on how to ensure research quality in core facilities. The ideas and proposed solutions address all aspects of research quality in core facilities. They are applicable in general or can be adapted to the specific needs of your core facility.
== Why Q-CoFa? ==
+
<hr/>  
  
In 2016 a survey of 1500 scientists published in Nature [http://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on-reproducibility-1.19970] highlighted that 70% scientists could not reproduce published results. We are now all aware of the importance of quality management, however there is still room for improvements.
 
  
== Mission of Q-CoFa ==
+
[[File:Q-CoFa-start-thin-dark.jpg|170px|link=Start here]]
  
This website presents a compilation of practical recommendations to improve research quality and service in your core facility. These are general ideas and principles how to improve research quality. The solutions need to be customized and
+
== Q-CoFa recommendations are based on: ==
adapted to the specific needs of your core facility.
 
  
== Start here ==
+
* '''[https://elifesciences.org/articles/62212 Results of the survey]''' of 275 core facilities about quality and management between CFs and users (in 2020)
 +
* Review of the '''[[current literature]]'''
 +
* '''[[Current guidelines and norms]]'''
  
{|
+
== How can Q-CoFa help me? ==
  
| width="50%" valign="top" style="background-color:#5999fe;padding:2px;border: 5px solid white; border-radius:50px;"|
+
* improve research quality
<div style="margin: 7px; padding: 2px; background-color:#fff3c1; border-radius: 35px;">
+
* improve efficiency and service
<div style="text-align:center;font-size:150%;">
+
* review my facility (critical self-assessment)
[[Start here]]
+
* benchmarking
</div> </div>
+
* prepare for an audit
 +
* establish a new core facility
  
|}
+
== Is Q-CoFa useful for me? ==
== Recommendations based on ==
 
  
* Survey results of 275 Core Facilities (in over 30 different fields) in 2020. Survey about quality and management between CF and users.
+
Here you can find out how you are performing in all aspects of research quality in order to identify your strengths and weaknesses.
* Review of current literature
 
* Actual guidelines and norms
 
  
== Recommendations useful for ==
+
[[File:Q-CoFa-test-thin-dark.jpg|170px|link=https://q-cofa.paasp.net/test-yourself/]]
  
* improving research quality
+
== New role for core facilities? ==
* improving efficiency and service
 
* review your facility (critical self-assessment)
 
* preparing for an audit
 
* setting up a new core facility
 
  
== Test yourself ==
+
* Teach and promote good scientific practices
[[Test yourself]]
+
* Scientific gatekeeping of good quality research
 +
* Deliver a quality stamp in the future?
  
 
== Please contribute ==
 
== Please contribute ==
  
This is a wiki website. Please feel free to participate to the dynamic improvement of this site. We welcome your collaboration.  
+
This is a wiki website. Please feel free to share your experience and add your own [[Start_here| recommendations here]]. In order to do that you first need to log in. We thank you for your collaboration.
 
 
== Contact us ==
 
[[Team]]
 
 
== Impressum ==
 
[[Impressum]]
 

Latest revision as of 12:40, 1 April 2021

Q-CoFa-title.jpg

What is Q-CoFa?

Q-CoFa is a project funded by BMBF to assess the interactions between core facilities and their users in order to provide recommendations for improving research practices and data quality. It was initiated as a response to the recent data reproducibility crisis in life-sciences, as exemplified by the survey of 1500 scientists published in Nature in 2016 [1], revealing that 70% scientists could not reproduce published results.

Who is Q-CoFa for?

This website is mainly intended for core facility leader but the information is also useful to core facility staff members and users.

Mission of Q-CoFa

This website presents a compilation of practical recommendations on how to ensure research quality in core facilities. The ideas and proposed solutions address all aspects of research quality in core facilities. They are applicable in general or can be adapted to the specific needs of your core facility.



Q-CoFa-start-thin-dark.jpg

Q-CoFa recommendations are based on:

How can Q-CoFa help me?

  • improve research quality
  • improve efficiency and service
  • review my facility (critical self-assessment)
  • benchmarking
  • prepare for an audit
  • establish a new core facility

Is Q-CoFa useful for me?

Here you can find out how you are performing in all aspects of research quality in order to identify your strengths and weaknesses.

Q-CoFa-test-thin-dark.jpg

New role for core facilities?

  • Teach and promote good scientific practices
  • Scientific gatekeeping of good quality research
  • Deliver a quality stamp in the future?

Please contribute

This is a wiki website. Please feel free to share your experience and add your own recommendations here. In order to do that you first need to log in. We thank you for your collaboration.