Difference between revisions of "Current literature"

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities
-Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study.
+Please feel free to add any relevant paper by clicking on the "Edit" tab and following the instructions.
-Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers
+<!-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
+HOW TO ADD YOUR OWN REFERENCE:
-FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee
+Add your reference in the same layout as the references below. E.g.:
+[url  space  text-to-be-displayed]
+Make sure there is 1 empty space above and below
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -->
-Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities
+[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023677220986819?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed CORE management: The reality principle, 2021]
-Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times
+[https://osf.io/ng32b Introduction to the EQIPD Quality System, 2020]
-How quality control could save your science
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32655325/   Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study, 2020]
-Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes
+[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54  Core facility management, 2020]
-A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32382253/   Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities, 2020]
-A manifesto for reproducible science
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33304201/  An international survey of Training Needs and Career Paths of Core Facility Staff, 2020]
-SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33196023/  The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods, 2020]
-Rethinking research reproducibility
+[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54  Core Facility Management,2020]
-Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31969795/  A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups, 2020]
-http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf
-http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31696348/  Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research, 2020]
-http://www.cell.com/star-methods
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32214315/  Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery, 2020]
-http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_300.pdf
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33057427/    Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study, 2020]
-The PREMIER concept is pre-registered at OSF: PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine: https://osf.io/xw75z/
+[https://elifesciences.org/articles/62212  A survey of research quality in core facilities, 2020]
-•	Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon? published in the EMBO Journal.
-•	We investigate practicable options for auditing which have the potential to improve quality of preclinical research in academia. Preprint: Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study: https://osf.io/y8tpd/  The manuscript is currently under review at Plos One.
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30518534/  Rethinking research reproducibility, 2019]
-•	A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine:  LabCIRS at Plos Biology
-•	A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences:F1000Research
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341068/  Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?, 2018]
-•	Rethinking research reproducibility. EMBO Journal
-•	Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research. Handb Exp Pharmacol. Springer
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30140172/   Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study, 2018]
-•	Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery. Plos Biology
+[http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf  Reproducibility guidelines, 2017]
+[http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_300.pdf  Responsibilities of  HHMI Authors, 2017]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28606390/   Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs, 2017]
+[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021  A manifesto for reproducible science, 2017]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29151820/ Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities, 2017]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620458/   Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities, 2017]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26819028/  How quality control could save your science, 2016]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26848284/  Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes, 2016]
+[https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmprep/WHO_TRS_996_annex05.pdf?ua=1 WHO Guidance on good data and record management practices, 2016]
+[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjF8tO8rITuAhV6wQIHHaDqBP4QFjAAegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.faseb.org%2FPortals%2F2%2FPDFs%2Fopa%2F2016%2FFASEB_Enhancing%2520Research%2520Reproducibility.pdf&usg=AOvVaw13YBpPvsMsI7Yjtr_GZc6b  FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee, 2016]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27906976/    A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine, 2016]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26835004/   A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, 2016]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26113702/  SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture, 2015]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23814500/  Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers, 2013]
+[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22131887/  Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times, 2011]
+[https://osf.io/3yxq4/   PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine]
+[http://www.cell.com/star-methods  Star Methods]

Difference between revisions of "Current literature"

Latest revision as of 09:45, 6 May 2021

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools