Difference between revisions of "Current literature"
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | + | Please feel free to add any relevant paper by clicking on the "Edit" tab and following the instructions. | |
− | + | <!-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |
+ | HOW TO ADD YOUR OWN REFERENCE: | ||
− | + | Add your reference in the same layout as the references below. E.g.: | |
+ | [url space text-to-be-displayed] | ||
+ | Make sure there is 1 empty space above and below | ||
+ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --> | ||
− | + | [https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023677220986819?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed CORE management: The reality principle, 2021] | |
− | + | [https://osf.io/ng32b Introduction to the EQIPD Quality System, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32655325/ Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54 Core facility management, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32382253/ Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33304201/ An international survey of Training Needs and Career Paths of Core Facility Staff, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33196023/ The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54 Core Facility Management,2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31969795/ A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31696348/ Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32214315/ Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33057427/ Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://elifesciences.org/articles/62212 A survey of research quality in core facilities, 2020] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30518534/ Rethinking research reproducibility, 2019] | |
− | Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon? | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341068/ Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?, 2018] |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30140172/ Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study, 2018] | |
− | + | [http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf Reproducibility guidelines, 2017] | |
− | + | [http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_300.pdf Responsibilities of HHMI Authors, 2017] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28606390/ Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs, 2017] | |
− | + | [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021 A manifesto for reproducible science, 2017] | |
− | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29151820/ Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities, 2017] | |
− | == | + | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620458/ Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities, 2017] |
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26819028/ How quality control could save your science, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26848284/ Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmprep/WHO_TRS_996_annex05.pdf?ua=1 WHO Guidance on good data and record management practices, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjF8tO8rITuAhV6wQIHHaDqBP4QFjAAegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.faseb.org%2FPortals%2F2%2FPDFs%2Fopa%2F2016%2FFASEB_Enhancing%2520Research%2520Reproducibility.pdf&usg=AOvVaw13YBpPvsMsI7Yjtr_GZc6b FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27906976/ A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26835004/ A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, 2016] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26113702/ SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture, 2015] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23814500/ Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers, 2013] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22131887/ Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times, 2011] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://osf.io/3yxq4/ PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.cell.com/star-methods Star Methods] |
Latest revision as of 09:45, 6 May 2021
Please feel free to add any relevant paper by clicking on the "Edit" tab and following the instructions.
CORE management: The reality principle, 2021
Introduction to the EQIPD Quality System, 2020
Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study, 2020
Core facility management, 2020
Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities, 2020
An international survey of Training Needs and Career Paths of Core Facility Staff, 2020
Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research, 2020
Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery, 2020
Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study, 2020
A survey of research quality in core facilities, 2020
Rethinking research reproducibility, 2019
Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?, 2018
Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study, 2018
Reproducibility guidelines, 2017
Responsibilities of HHMI Authors, 2017
Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs, 2017
A manifesto for reproducible science, 2017
Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities, 2017
How quality control could save your science, 2016
Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes, 2016
WHO Guidance on good data and record management practices, 2016
FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee, 2016
A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine, 2016
A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, 2016
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture, 2015
Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers, 2013
Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times, 2011
PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine