Quality improvements: Recommendations: Difference between revisions

From Q-CoFa
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "There are many possibilities to improve research quality: * Use of a management software and ELN to improve efficiency and traceability. *..."
 
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* improve [[SOPs: Recommendations|SOPs]], [[Data management: Recommendations|data management plan]], [[Documentation: Recommendations|documentation]].
* improve [[SOPs: Recommendations|SOPs]], [[Data management: Recommendations|data management plan]], [[Documentation: Recommendations|documentation]].
* quality accreditation, audit, yearly review of CF processes, CF staff feedback, [[:File:User-feedback-form.docx|user’s feedback]]
* quality accreditation, audit, yearly review of CF processes, CF staff feedback, [[:File:User-feedback-form.docx|user’s feedback]]


'''Audit / Review'''
'''Audit / Review'''

Revision as of 08:53, 18 January 2021

There are many possibilities to improve research quality:


Audit / Review

A yearly audit from external colleagues or a self-review with all the CF staff will allow you to reflect on your performance, identify and solve problems together and think of possible improvements.

  • Present: review the current processes.
  • Future: identify improvements to implement in the coming year.
  • Past: check the implementation status of the previous year’s resolutions and assess their usefulness.

Write a summary of the session, including the findings, solutions and responsibilities. And don’t forget to schedule the next year meeting…