Difference between revisions of "Current literature"

From Q-CoFa
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study. Best practices for core facilities: handli...")
 
 
(13 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities
 
  
Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study.  
+
Please feel free to add any relevant paper by clicking on the "Edit" tab and following the instructions.
  
Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers
+
<!-- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 +
HOW TO ADD YOUR OWN REFERENCE:
  
FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee
+
Add your reference in the same layout as the references below. E.g.:
 +
[url  space  text-to-be-displayed]
 +
Make sure there is 1 empty space above and below
 +
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -->
  
Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities
+
[https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0023677220986819?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed CORE management: The reality principle, 2021]
  
Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times
+
[https://osf.io/ng32b Introduction to the EQIPD Quality System, 2020]
  
How quality control could save your science
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32655325/  Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study, 2020]
  
Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes
+
[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54  Core facility management, 2020]
  
A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32382253/  Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities, 2020]
  
A manifesto for reproducible science
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33304201/  An international survey of Training Needs and Career Paths of Core Facility Staff, 2020]
  
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33196023/  The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods, 2020]
  
Rethinking research reproducibility
+
[https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-57049-0_54  Core Facility Management,2020]
  
Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31969795/ A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups, 2020]
http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf
 
  
http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/checklist.pdf
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31696348/ Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research, 2020]
  
http://www.cell.com/star-methods
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32214315/ Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery, 2020]
  
http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_300.pdf
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33057427/   Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study, 2020]
  
The PREMIER concept is pre-registered at OSF: PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine: https://osf.io/xw75z/
+
[https://elifesciences.org/articles/62212  A survey of research quality in core facilities, 2020]
Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon? published in the EMBO Journal.
+
 
• We investigate practicable options for auditing which have the potential to improve quality of preclinical research in academia. Preprint: Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study: https://osf.io/y8tpdThe manuscript is currently under review at Plos One.
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30518534/  Rethinking research reproducibility, 2019]
A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine: LabCIRS at Plos Biology
+
 
A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences:F1000Research
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341068/ Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?, 2018]
• Rethinking research reproducibility. EMBO Journal
+
 
• Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research. Handb Exp Pharmacol. Springer
+
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30140172/  Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study, 2018]
• Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery. Plos Biology
+
 
 +
[http://www.cell.com/pb/assets/raw/journals/society/biophysj/PDFs/reproducibility-guidelines.pdf  Reproducibility guidelines, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[http://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_300.pdf  Responsibilities of  HHMI Authors, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28606390/  Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-016-0021  A manifesto for reproducible science, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29151820/ Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28620458/  Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities, 2017]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26819028/  How quality control could save your science, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26848284/  Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/pharmprep/WHO_TRS_996_annex05.pdf?ua=1 WHO Guidance on good data and record management practices, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjF8tO8rITuAhV6wQIHHaDqBP4QFjAAegQIBxAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.faseb.org%2FPortals%2F2%2FPDFs%2Fopa%2F2016%2FFASEB_Enhancing%2520Research%2520Reproducibility.pdf&usg=AOvVaw13YBpPvsMsI7Yjtr_GZc6b FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27906976/    A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26835004/  A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, 2016]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26113702/  SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture, 2015]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23814500/  Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers, 2013]
 +
 
 +
[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22131887/  Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times, 2011]
 +
 
 +
[https://osf.io/3yxq4/  PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine]
 +
 
 +
[http://www.cell.com/star-methods  Star Methods]

Latest revision as of 09:45, 6 May 2021

Please feel free to add any relevant paper by clicking on the "Edit" tab and following the instructions.


CORE management: The reality principle, 2021

Introduction to the EQIPD Quality System, 2020

Building a Quality Management System in a Core Facility: A Genomics Core Case Study, 2020

Core facility management, 2020

Bioinformatics Core Survey Highlights the Challenges Facing Data Analysis Facilities, 2020

An international survey of Training Needs and Career Paths of Core Facility Staff, 2020

The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods, 2020

Core Facility Management,2020

A Review of the Scientific Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency Studies Conducted by the ABRF Research Groups, 2020

Resolving the Tension Between Exploration and Confirmation in Preclinical Biomedical Research, 2020

Preregistration of exploratory research: Learning from the golden age of discovery, 2020

Improving quality of preclinical academic research through auditing: A feasibility study, 2020

A survey of research quality in core facilities, 2020

Rethinking research reproducibility, 2019

Quality management for academic laboratories: burden or boon?, 2018

Building a Sustainable Portfolio of Core Facilities: a Case Study, 2018

Reproducibility guidelines, 2017

Responsibilities of HHMI Authors, 2017

Reproducibility in light microscopy: Maintenance, standards and SOPs, 2017

A manifesto for reproducible science, 2017

Name It! Store It! Protect It!: A Systems Approach to Managing Data in Research Core Facilities, 2017

Reproducibility2020: Progress and priorities, 2017

How quality control could save your science, 2016

Metrics for Success: Strategies for Enabling Core Facility Performance and Assessing Outcomes, 2016

WHO Guidance on good data and record management practices, 2016

FASEB Research Reproducibility Steering Committee, 2016

A Laboratory Critical Incident and Error Reporting System for Experimental Biomedicine, 2016

A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciences, 2016

SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture, 2015

Best practices for core facilities: handling external customers, 2013

Institutional Management of Core Facilities during Challenging Financial Times, 2011

PREMIER: Structured Quality Assurance from and for Academic Preclinical Biomedicine

Star Methods