Difference between revisions of "Start here"
(→Specific recommendations per core facility type) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | __NOTOC__ | ||
All aspects of research quality are presented on this page. Each aspect contains 3 parts: | All aspects of research quality are presented on this page. Each aspect contains 3 parts: | ||
* in the first one is a '''test''' to assess one’s strengths and weaknesses in this area (5-6 questions) | * in the first one is a '''test''' to assess one’s strengths and weaknesses in this area (5-6 questions) |
Revision as of 09:42, 29 March 2021
All aspects of research quality are presented on this page. Each aspect contains 3 parts:
- in the first one is a test to assess one’s strengths and weaknesses in this area (5-6 questions)
- in the second one are recommendations how to improve this specific aspect
- in the third one is a download centre to share concrete files and templates.
What would you like to improve at your facility?
Communication |
Interaction with users |
Responsibility |
Training of users |
Training of CF staff |
|
Management |
Experimental design |
Samples |
Raw data acquisition |
Data analysis |
Data management |
Documentation |
Publication |
Quality checkpoints |
Benchmarking |
Quality improvements |
Accreditation |
Website |
Visibility and Networking |
Funding |
I don’t know!
If you don't know where to start you can take this general test (36 questions, 10 minutes) to identify in which areas your weaknesses are.
Specific recommendations per core facility type
In addition to the general recommendations above, which are valid for all types of core facilities, there are particular aspects, which are relevent to one type of core facilities.
This section is for specific recommendations per CF types.
Please contribute
This is a wiki website. Please feel free to share your experience and add your own recommendations. In order to do that you first need to log in. For detailed instructions, click on "Help" in the left sidebar. We thank you for your collaboration.